JS NewsPlus - шаблон joomla Продвижение
Saturday, 16 December 2017 | Login


The Internet of Things, CIA and a Massive Privacy Problem in a Big Data World by Bernard Marr

The Internet of Things, CIA and a Massive Privacy Problem in a Big Data World by Bernard Marr

For me, the most shocking revelations to come out of Wikileaks’ release of classified CIA documents relating to the agency’s spying activities has been how the alleged vector of attack has changed to targeting consumer electronic devices.

Whether it is iPhones, Android devices or Samsung Smart TVs, the spy agency has clearly seen the opportunities provided by the often paper-thin security of many of today’s IoT-connected, smart gadgets.

Whereas in the cold war era, agents would, we are told, sneak into hotel rooms and offices undercover, in order to plant bugs and monitoring devices, today there is no need. The connected world offers them ready-built conduits into our homes and vehicles. And judging by the arsenal of hacking tools the CIA has been revealed to have at its disposal, manufacturers’ attempts to secure our privacy have been at best incompetent, and at worst, collaborative.

Of course, the documents, so far, do not go into a great deal of depth about how widely these intrusive technologies have been deployed. In other words, we know what they can do, but very little about what they have actually done.

The best case scenario is that these tools all represent technology that has been deployed legally – that is, used when security services have, through the correct channels, established there is a situation which requires them to take action to protect the public.

But the potential implications go far wider. These tools haven’t all been developed by the CIA themselves – in fact a substantial portion of the leaked information relates to a catalog of software and utilities that have been “collected”. No-one knows who they have been collected from. But what it does show is that the CIA has been aware for some time that the devices we are increasingly filling our homes with are not safe. And rather than act to help manufacturers and software developers shore up those vulnerabilities, they researched how they could best be exploited.

It’s scary, because there is certainly a lack of understanding about how thoroughly sensors, scanners and cameras cover our lives, and just how powerful, in theory (and it seems practice) their potential for surveillance is.

The problem might be that it’s simply too big a concern for most people to worry about – we know we aren’t going to sacrifice our smartphones and Internet-enabled TVs, and in coming years we’re probably be buying swarms of autonomous cars and IoT home entertainment and utility devices. Most of us probably rely on the fact that there’s nothing in particular of interest about us for someone to want to spy on us in the first place.

But this complacency – though understandable – is based on the flawed assumption that whoever has this power – be it the CIA, partner agencies they work with, or anyone who has got access to the same tools – will always be working in our best interests. History tells us that this will far from always be the case, and the CIA actions at the base of the recent revelations again make that point.

Thanks to Snowden of course, we’ve known for years that intelligence services are engaged in mass-surveillance of the public. These leaks show just how far reaching their capabilities have become, when it comes to extracting data about our lives. And when you consider how this data could be used, together with cutting edge analytics and machine learning – , it goes beyond even what George Orwell imagined in 1984. At least his hidden cameras had to be monitored by humans to determine who should be accused of facecrime or thoughtcrime. 

Some have sought to downplay the implications of the leaks – suggesting that it has long been known that security services are capable of accessing personal devices and turning them into surveillance tools. This is true – but in my opinion comes dangerously close to “normalizing” the idea that we should accept intrusion into our personal and private lives. Again, the scary implication is not necessarily what the US government is doing now, but what a future government or even a private entity, in the US or elsewhere, could potentially do tomorrow.

On the other hand, hopefully this will act as a wake-up call. It’s certainly true that Snowden’s 2013 revelations sparked a wave of interest and awareness in encryption – to the point that it became enabled by default in Whatsapp, the world’s most popular messaging application. The installed userbase of the “secure” messaging app Signal also have soared. This reassures me that an ever-growing number of people are becoming aware of privacy issues, and willing to take basic steps to safeguard their data.

What’s needed now is continued demand from citizens that their governments and security services put their interests first – and that means protecting their rights to privacy and ensuring that these powerful and invasive tools are only used when public safety is at stake. As always, please share your views and thoughts in the comments below.

Thank you for reading my post. Here at LinkedIn and at Forbes I regularly write about management, technology and Big Data. If you would like to read my future posts then simply join my network here or click 'Follow'. Also feel free to connect on TwitterFacebook or Slideshare

Also, you might like to know that my brand new book 'Data Strategy: How to Profit from a World of Big Data, Analytics and the Internet of Things' is now available for pre-order.

And if you want something to read now, then you could check out my my new and free ebook 'Beyond The Big Data Buzz: How Data Is Disrupting Business In Every Industry In The World'.

Original article at linkedin

Related items

  • Elon Musk, His New Company, and Science

    Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has founded a new company called Neuralink Corp. According to the Wall Street Journal Neuralink will be pursuing what Musk has previously called “neural lace” technology, which consists of implanting tiny brain electrodes that could one day upload and download our thoughts. This type of technology has been fantasized about for some time and has actually been under development with recent breakthrough in research.


    In The Culture science fiction series, written by Scottish author Iain M. Banks, humanoids install devices on their brains called a “neural lace.” A mesh that grows with your brain, it’s essentially a wireless brain-computer interface. And now a new kind of flexible circuit has made this science fiction type of future a reality. Implanted via injection, a grid of wires only a few millimeters across can be incorporated with living neurons and listen in to their activity, offering a way for electronics to interface with your brain. Charles Lieber, a nanotechnologist at Harvard University and co-author of a study describing the device in Nature Nanotechnology says that they’re trying to blur the distinction between electronic circuits and a living system. Sounds right up Mr. Musk’s alley.

    Lieber’s idea is to create a conductive brain interface that mirrors the fine details of the brain itself. As neurons connect with each other in a network that has open spaces where proteins and fluids pass through, the crosshatches in the bendable mesh electronics leave room for neurons to fit in. Electronic brain interfaces like these could someday be crucial for people with neurological diseases such as Parkinson’s.

    Musk brought up the idea of using this kind of technology at Recode’s Code Conference in 2016 saying that this would be a digital layer located above the cortex and built right into the brain. This would intertwine computers with the human brain. We have already augmented our capabilities with technology like mobile phones and other devices, all connected to the internet and software services in the cloud. I have the whole internet in the palm of my hand.

    The thinking behind Neuralink would take this one step further and provide a brain-computer interface in a way that would truly begin to meld human and machine. Elon Musk believes this is an imperative before AI eats the world. His focus certainly seems to be around enhancing capabilities to create humans with super powers, while the researchers are more looking to help with medical conditions and correct deficiencies. Either way, the notion of a brain-computer interface is attractive and would potentially allow an AI layer over my cerebral cortex and could even allow at some point my consciousness to be uploaded to the cloud.

    Ray Kurzweil, Chief Scientist at Google, famously believes that this will be possible by 2045. During his speech at the Global Futures 2045 International Congress in New York, June 2013 Kurzweil said:

    “Based on conservative estimates of the amount of computation you need to functionally simulate a human brain, we’ll be able to expand the scope of our intelligence a billion-fold.”

    In Kurweil’s book, The Singularity Is Near, he plots this development and journey towards singularity in a graph. I don’t think that Elon Musk is necessarily trying to hasten the advent of the singularity, but it does seem that he is closely aligned to Ray’s thinking.

    Original Article at Energynews Nigeria

  • 'If You Can Build a Good Foundation, Particularly In the Tech Field, It Will Take You Far'

    Information technology veteran Christine Louw, who is currently the GE Transportation Sub-Saharan Africa IT Programme Manager, oversees the IT for GE Transportation in Nigeria, Kenya, Angola, Mozambique, Namibia and South Africa, where she is based. The IT scope for these countries is significant in size, but thankfully, Christine has an integrated team in each of the countries to help with implementation on the  ground.

    Christine has a formidable 31 years of experience in the IT field and is fortunate to have done ground-breaking work in several instances to shatter the glass ceiling in a predominantly male-dominated field. When she enrolled to study at the University of the Witwatersrand (WITS) in 1978, she wanted to be a chartered accountant, but the second year of her degree proved to be an interesting time as the campus was restructuring the science degrees to include IT and commerce, and she was in one of the first classes where this change was implemented. This introduced a whole new world of possibilities for students as WITS was at a point where the institution realised that commerce, IT and computer science had a huge role to play in the future. Christine said she felt very privileged to have been a part of this historic change at WITS.

    Christine graduated with a Bachelor of Commerce degree in Information Systems. At the time, she was a qualified programmer, specialising in Common Business Oriented Language (Cobol), the  second-oldest high-level programming language popularly used to create business applications that run on large computer  networks. This gave Christine a very good foundation to start with, particularly during the first few years of her career.

    Due to the political climate in South Africa at the time, there were challenges that businesses experienced in buying software from other countries. Christine had started working at an IT company where they were developing their own Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software and again, she was part of another ground-breaking experience as a professional and as a woman in the tech industry. As a programmer, she found herself being deeply involved in writing ERP software and some of those ERP fundamentals are still being used by some IT companies today.

    "This is where I learned how important it is to have a good mentor to learn from early in your career because this is how you build a good foundation and grow in the technology field," said Christine, who also felt that a great deal of what contributed to her career development was being in  the right place at the right time and choosing a company that offered possibilities to learn.


    "If you can build a good foundation, particularly in the tech field, it will take you far." Christine still uses the skills she learnt early in  her career and continues to rely on the knowledge she learnt when she started. "When you have a good base, it makes it easier to understand the underlying principles."

    "One thing I always looked for when I was job-searching was a job that allowed me to be flexible, to attend my children's school activities and to share important moments in their lives. I would advise women to choose a company that is going somewhere because you will learn and grow there." Having five children to nurture proved to be challenging for Christine, but she was fortunate to find good people to look after her children while she was blazing a trail in the IT space.

    When talking about mentorship, Christine said that she started with  her children. "Charity begins at home, so I have always done my best to empower my children. I encouraged them to save money and pursue their passion. I have also put more emphasis on my two daughters due to the challenges women face in male-dominated environments."

    During her time at GE, Christine was fortunate to be part of the RISE Leadership Programme in 2015. "GE provides several opportunities for training and it helps for one to take full advantage of them due to the fact that the organisation is hugely diverse."

    When asked about her thoughts on encouraging women in STEM roles, Christine responded with an affirmative "Why not? It is the right thing to do, so, why shouldn't we? The one challenge of being in a STEM career as a  woman is that you will often find that you are the only woman in meetings." Christine overcame this by finding the common element and engaging the room on that level to break the ice. She sees being the only woman in a room as an opportunity to bring value and a different dimension to the business at hand. "Women do bring in different perspectives and have a lot of value to add."

    Original article at GE Lagos

  • Tanzania Eyes Korean Technology in Sustainable Use of Natural Resources

    Tanzania is ready to borrow a leaf from Korea's economic growth model that uses natural resources in a sustainable manner towards industrialisation with minimal environmental risks.

    Korea embraced the Green Growth Initiative towards a vision of 'Low Carbon, Green Growth' as the core of the country's new vision on the 60th anniversary of the founding nation.

    Minister of State in Vice President's Office, Union Matters and Environment, January Makamba said in Dar es Salaam yesterday that the government will promote sectors that have the most potential for job creation and capable of addressing resource efficiency and environment.

    "As we move towards industrialisation within the next ten years, we'll also be in the forefront in bringing about Green Growth through resource efficiency policies and strategies," said the minister at the opening of the fourth Korean Green Growth Annual event in the city.

    The initiative is currently executed jointly by the Korean Green Growth Trust Fund and the World Bank. Both partners share a common goal to reduce poverty and promote shared economic prosperity in environmentally responsible and socially inclusive way.

    Mr Makamba said there was a lot to learn from Korea, pointing out that the East Asian nation has become a leading global force in promoting green growth as a new development paradigm.


    "We also envisage having one industry's waste becoming another's raw material," he observed.

    Mr Makamba noted that the government will ensure that Green Growth catalyses investment and innovations which underpin sustainable growth and give rise to new economic opportunities while taking full account of the social consequences of greening the growth dynamic economies.

    "We all understand that green growth is not a replacement of sustainable development agenda but rather ensures that natural resource assets can deliver their full economic potential on a sustainable manner," he observed.

    Korean Strategy and Finance Vice Minister, Mr Song Eon-Seog, noted that Korea was holding its Annual Korea Green Growth Event for the first time in Africa to showcase progress made in various countries in turning green growth concepts into viable solutions for developing countries.

    "The event will introduce green growth examples as Addis Ababa's innovative capacity building programme for green cities, Tanzania's use of emerging technologies such as electric unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) to advance mapping, flood response and environmental management," he said.

    Tanzania Daily News 


  • Africa: Providing Sustainable Energy Isn't Just About Gadgets and Dollars

    Around the world, 1.1 billion people have no electricity and 2.9 billion can't cook with "clean" energy. The international community has big aspirations to tackle this challenge, and its focus is on sustainable energy.

    This involves providing poor women and men with affordable access to electricity for modern energy services like lighting and communications. The needs also extend to clean cooking options to mitigate the negative health effects of cooking with wood, charcoal, coal or animal waste. Many of these people live in remote locations with no access to electricity grids, or live within reach of the grid but cannot afford to connect. This has led to a focus on the potential of off-grid, renewable energy options.

    A UN scheme - called the UN Sustainable Energy for All initiative - has set itself the goal of ensuring that everyone in the world has access to sustainable energy for all by 2030. This is a big ambition. Yet the international community still doesn't understand enough about how to overcome the problem of energy access, and what's needed to deliver it for everyone.


    Two dimensions have dominated the debate: hardware and finance. We need technological hardware (for instance solar PV or wind turbines) and we need finance to pay for it. Much of the research on the problem has come from engineers and economists, informing policy agendas that respond to their concerns.

    But there are three other dimensions that have been largely ignored in research and policy. These are culture, politics, and innovation. Looking at past successes in sustainable energy shows why they are crucial, and why ignoring them could lead to disappointment or failure.

    Behind Kenya's incredible success story

    A key "transformational" example often referred to by international policy makers and researchers is the incredible success of the off-grid solar PV market in Kenya. This includes solar home systems, for which Kenya is estimated to have one of the largest per capita markets in the world. There's also a rapidly expanding market for solar portable lanterns. It also includes the rapidly emerging phenomenon of pay as you go, mobile-enabled solar PV.


    In our recent book, we have constructed the most detailed account to date of the history of the off-grid solar PV market in Kenya - drawing on a decade of empirical research, including over 100 hours of interviews and workshops in the country.

    This market is often described - wrongly - as an "unsubsidised", "free market success story" Supposedly, as the technological hardware emerged, it became cheap and reliable enough and, thanks to a lack of any government meddling, private sector entrepreneurs grew the market to what it is today.

    Our research reveals a very different story, dating back several decades. Back then, a few early champions saw the opportunities for solar PV to provide energy access in Kenya.

    Besides some shrewd political manoeuvring, these pioneers also had to understand the social and cultural reasons behind the ways that households, schools and hospitals consumed and paid for energy services. They also had to use the right language to persuade donors, obsessed with 'fixing' market failures, to support long-term capacity building.


    This included market research, training for local technicians, installing demonstration solar home systems, helping vendors to understand systems and how to support customers.

    The result was a thriving innovation system around solar PV. The early pioneers, who understood the importance not just of tech and finance, but also politics, culture and innovation, used these insights to build the foundations for the private sector growth we see today in Kenya. Lighting Africa, a later initiative, seems to have taken these political, social and cultural aspects seriously too, which has been material to its success in Kenya.

    Now, another new form of energy access has built on these foundations: mobile payments for solar PV. This "pay as you go" model for solar electricity relies on the combination of two technologies: cheap Chinese solar PV and mobile banking. It has been held up as a transformational new technology and, on the surface, it looks like a mainly technical achievement.

    Why culture and politics too

    But when you dig down deeper, a better understanding begins to emerge of the early development of pay as you go solar PV models. You learn how much time these early innovators spent understanding the socio-cultural dimension of this issue.

    People who are now CEOs of booming pay as you go solar companies spent years living with local people and developing in-depth knowledge of how culture, and even gender, affected how people paid for and consumed energy. To be successful at meeting people's needs, they had to think through and experiment with how to structure these payments.


    There are also clear political dimensions to the pay as you go solar PV phenomenon. For example, the UK's Department for International Development was only able to help develop the M-Pesa mobile banking system in Kenya because of political relationships and the government's willingness to work with donors around a "private sector entrepreneurship" agenda. But if mobile payments for solar PV began to look like a serious challenge to the central government's investments, the Kenyan story might look very different.

    Understanding these deeper aspects of innovation could help donors who are now looking to support Sustainable Energy for All. Of course, technology and finance are crucial to making it happen. But so are culture, politics and the broader sense in which innovation happens.

    Original Article at The Conversation

Login to post comments